The guardians of the “Official 9/11” theory (19 hijackers with box cutters) rarely deal with facts, or evidence. Rather they will instead lower themselves and disrespect the reader (and the need for open honest discussion) by calling anyone who questions the official story names.

In this talk, based on his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Griffin rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory.

Pointing out that most objections to the alternative theory, according to which 9/11 was an inside job, are based on purely a priori arguments and a propagandistic use of the term conspiracy theory, he shows that if we get empirical about 9/11, we can quickly see that the official story cannot be true.

Note: Google videos sometimes don’t play on load. If this happens refreshing your browser (sometimes more then once) will remedy the problem.